On Guam, using the ABA model code, various procurement law and regulations demand that specifications not be tailored or otherwise unreasonably non-competitive, but laws are useless unless policed. Moreover, mere adherence to the bare minimum strictures of the law without taking guidance from its policy and purpose encourages the tendency toward bespoke specifications.
Evidently, that may be a problem in New Jersey, too, as this report indicates.
Fairness of bid process questioned
Questions have continued over whether the Monmouth County government's bidding process is fair to vendors and efficient for taxpayers, with the freeholder board instructing administrators to begin a second internal review of procedures and Democratic freeholders asking the state Local Finance Board for an investigation.
Freeholder John Curley, one of the majority Republicans, first raised the issue in June, primarily claiming that bid specifications were often not generic and thus limited competition among vendors, he said.
Curley has noted that bid specifications often require that a vendor deliver a new vehicle within 30 days, favoring bidders that have vehicles on hand.
"What this means is that vendors are getting rid of unsold trucks loaded with unnecessary options at county taxpayer expense," D'Amico said.
Administrators conducted a previous review last month. Republican Freeholder Director Lillian Burry said the findings left her "assured that bid specification and procurement procedures utilized by the county have been compliant with the public contract law."
In a memorandum to board members, Purchasing Director Gerri Popkin said, "Please be assured this county has a longtime, good reputation of being fair, open and equitable to all during our bidding processes and for being in compliance with governing rules and statutes, of where there are many."
No comments:
Post a Comment