Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Procurement controversies series -- Quebec

Lax rules let Quebec politicians funnel contracts to pals, Chabonneau commission told
A retired senior Quebec bureaucrat kicked off the Charbonneau Commission hearings Friday by recounting a history of secretive, lax and often corrupt procurement practices that allowed politicians to funnel contracts to party loyalists and rubber-stamp huge cost overruns that essentially plundered the public purse.

Lafrance took the stand at 9:30 a.m. and over the course of the day walked the commissioners through more than 50 years of history that reflected a constant struggle to reign in corrupt practices.

He said that it wasn’t until the Quiet Revolution in the early 1960s that the government began the process of cleansing the system; a process that continues to this day.

What became apparent from Lafrance’s historical recounting was that despite the many changes to the contracting laws, the same problems of corruption, collusion and favouritism still exist in 2012.

Lafrance said that during the Maurice Duplessis era, the so-called Department of Colonization controlled all procurement, secretly distributing contracts to loyalists of Duplessis’s Union Nationale.

He noted that a government study of the contracting system in 1960 concluded that the system was “immoral, scandalous, humiliating and disquieting for the public” because it essentially allowed cabinet to hand out contracts to the supporters of the governing party.

In the 1960s, systems were put into place to create lists of “qualified” contractors with various expertise and to improve transparency. But even then, Lafrance said that officials often had no idea whether contractors on the lists even existed or were in fact qualified to do the job.

One major problem, he said, was a lack of control over cost overruns.

He said they were the result of bad project management on the work site, but the government simply paid out the additional funds without verifying the demanded amounts.

Responding to mounting public complaints, the province began a gradual process of modifying its contracting regulations to meet national and international standards of transparency and competition.

This included publishing all tenders on an international publicly-accessible computer network that manages the bidding process.

Lafrance concluded his testimony by saying that no matter what legislation is adopted or policies put into place, stamping out corruption depends on “the ethics” of the people involved.

Read more at the link above
.

No comments: