Labels and Tags

Accountability (69) Adequate documentation (6) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (2) Compliance (33) Conflict of interest (31) Contract administration (25) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (19) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (34) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (32) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (33) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (48) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (93) Principles of procurement (24) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (78) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (16) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (10) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (13) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (47) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (2) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (60) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Monsoon of scams?

It's raining scams: Chopper controversy's yet another proof of political foot-dragging on corruption
It's politics as usual. Facing graft charges in a Rs 3,546-crore chopper deal inked in 2010, the Congress says spadework for the transaction began under NDA rule. The BJP exhumes the Bofors ghost, playing up the Italian origin of the scandal-hit defence firm, Finmeccanica, whose CEO was arrested in a graft-related probe in Italy. Instead of mudslinging, both sides should focus on the problem at hand. The corruption issue that led to widespread protests in 2011 hasn't gone away. The question is, what's been done about it?

It's not enough to say India won't lose money courtesy the deal's 'integrity clause'. What about powerful people and middlemen alleged to have illegally profited? We need a thorough probe to book those found guilty, no matter how influential they may be. Sadly, foot-dragging is evident across the political board on institutional clean-ups.

Not a single systemic reform is fully up and running yet, whether to promote transparent public procurement, non-discretionary resource allocation, strict social spending audits, targeted services delivery or revamp of land acquisition norms. The CBI's autonomy remains an issue. Judicial and police reforms are pending. And UPA-II seems to think knee-jerk moratoriums on defence purchases ”in lieu of effective monitoring” suffices to bury scandal, even if the price paid is delayed modernisation of India's military.

Whether it's the prime minister or defence minister, government representatives can no longer make personal probity an alibi against failure to stem all-pervasive corruption.

No comments: