Labels and Tags

Accountability (69) Adequate documentation (6) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (2) Compliance (33) Conflict of interest (31) Contract administration (25) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (19) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (34) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (32) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (33) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (48) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (93) Principles of procurement (24) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (78) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (16) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (10) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (13) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (47) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (2) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (60) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

What's the point of having rules?

Out of Singapore, we have this globally recurring theme:

Procurement lapses due to individual officers' failure to follow rules: MOF
The Auditor-General's report scrutinized the expenditure of government ministries and statutory boards for the last financial year and was released on Wednesday. Several ministries were cited for various oversights.
[The StraitsTimes reported, For instance, the Media Development Authority negotiated with a vendor for a revised proposal to organise the $4.57 million Film Festival. This was after the request for proposal exercise had closed, and contravened government rules. Another tender by Republic Polytechnic was not conducted in an open and fair manner, Auditor-General Willie Tan said. The tender was for a $19.14 million project to develop an integrated academic system."]

The Ministry of Finance said it has reminded all permanent secretaries and heads of government agencies to pay close attention to procurement issues.

Government agencies are also urged to undertake regular reviews of procurement processes and ensure vigilant supervision throughout all stages of the procurement process.

The ministry stressed that it is essential that the public service and its officers remain fully accountable for the use of public funds and uphold the integrity of public procurement.

To further strengthen government procurement as a whole, the ministry said it has already stepped up the training of public officers, as well as requiring all agencies to conduct regular internal audits to provide an independent check.

Work is also in progress to develop a procurement specialist track, with professional development opportunities and proper career pathways.

MOF explained that the procurement specialist track will help professionalise the practice of procurement by giving officers greater recognition and more opportunities to develop deep skills and knowledge.

The ministry said while it cannot expect to be able to completely eliminate lapses in a system with over 80,000 tenders and quotations annually, the public service is committed to take every effort to avoid them or promptly rectify them when they are detected.

No comments: