Labels and Tags

Accountability (69) Adequate documentation (6) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (2) Compliance (33) Conflict of interest (31) Contract administration (25) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (19) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (34) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (32) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (33) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (48) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (93) Principles of procurement (24) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (78) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (16) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (10) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (13) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (47) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (2) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (60) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Monday, June 23, 2014

Plan ahead for protests

Innovators: Aneesh Chopra says open data is key if government wants to solve big problems   (An interview with Aneesh Chopra)
   Aneesh Chopra become the nation’s first chief technology officer under President Obama, a position that oversaw a series of federal initiatives to make government data more accessible to the private sector and general public. That experience serves as the backbone of Chopra’s recently released book, “Innovative State: How New Technologies Can Transform Government.”

The bungled roll out of has been well documented. What stands out to you as a key lesson for the government and the private sector to learn from that experience?
The No. 1 lesson is we have to tackle is fixing the procurement system.

If you do a fair and open competition, and you pick something, you know the first thing that’s going to happen is someone’s going to protest. You have to factor that into your time cycle.
Is the first step to reform eliminating procurement protests?
Life is generally about balance. There are obviously circumstances under which protesting is warranted ... but you want to have more skin in the game.  Protesting for no reason as part of a way of doing business isn’t sustainable, nor do I think is it the right thing. There has to be a better way.

In general, lowering the barriers to entry and increasing the capacity of the system to root out mistakes, errors or outright fraud, those have to be the guiding principles. Are there people in the U.S. who could have helped build in a more cost effective manner, and with greater agility and responsibility? I’m pretty sure the answer would be yes.

No comments: