Labels and Tags

Accountability (66) Adequate documentation (5) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (14) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (28) Competitive position (2) Compliance (32) Conflict of interest (28) Contract administration (24) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (1) Contractor responsibility (18) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (32) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (34) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (35) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (13) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (6) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (28) Mistakes (3) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (31) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (46) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (88) Principles of procurement (21) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (75) Procurement ethics (17) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (15) Procurement procedures (29) Procurement reform (57) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (1) Protest - timing (10) Protests - general (35) Purposes and policies of procurement (9) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (3) Responsiveness (11) Restrictive specifications (4) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (46) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (1) Standards of review (2) Standing (5) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (9) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (59) Uniformity (5) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Procurement controversy du jour: Philippines voting machines

This story illustrates the problem with bid protests: not the protests themselves, which can reveal questionable judgment or incompetence, but the need for an expeditious resolution of them, especially judicial review.

EDITORIAL - Resolve the questions quickly
Legal challenges were expected in the maintenance contract for voting machines that was awarded just three days before Sixto Brillantes Jr. retired on Feb. 2 as chairman of the Commission on Elections. Smartmatic-Total Information Management, which supplied the 80,000 precinct count optical scan machines that the Comelec used in the 2010 and 2013 polls, bagged the P268.8-million contract to refurbish the PCOS machines for the general elections next year.

Those opposing the deal argue that it should have been opened to public bidding as required under government procurement laws instead of being approved merely as an extension of a warranty for the PCOS machines. For its part, the Comelec argued that aside from time constraints as it prepares for next year’s polls, it would be risky to award the diagnostics and repair of the PCOS machines to another company.

Yesterday the Comelec warned that the court TRO could set back the timetable for poll preparations seriously enough to compel a return to manual voting in 2016. After automated elections in 2010 and 2013, Filipinos are sure to protest against a return to the long, laborious and fraud-prone manual vote.

All sectors, including the courts, must do their part to prevent this from happening. The courts must not take their usual sweet time in resolving the challenges to the refurbishment contract. The other day, the Supreme Court voted 12-2 to issue a temporary restraining order on the deal, effective immediately and with no specified duration. The slow administration of justice is already wreaking havoc in places such as Makati, where no one knows when the legal question over the suspension of the mayor will be settled with finality. With only 13 months to go before the general elections, the SC must act more quickly in the case of the Comelec deal with Smartmatic-TIM. The nation wants poll automation, and it should be conducted as smoothly as possible, with all legal challenges resolved.

No comments: