Labels and Tags

Accountability (69) Adequate documentation (6) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (2) Compliance (33) Conflict of interest (31) Contract administration (25) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (19) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (34) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (32) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (33) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (48) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (93) Principles of procurement (24) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (78) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (16) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (10) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (13) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (47) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (2) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (60) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Procurement too difficult, to a degree

Bill would change procurement rules for public universties, including NIU
House Bill 4215, the Illinois College Procurement Reform Act, would allow public university boards of higher education to develop their own procurement rules. As it is, universities are required to follow regulatory processes outlined in the Illinois Procurement Code. State Rep. Mark Batinick has filed the house bill.

The procurement process is complicated and often requires universities to jump through administrative hoops, Batinick said. Some of the regulations include a strict approval process and competitive bidding requirements, Batinick said.

Paul Palian, NIU director of media and public relations said university officials would like to see the process streamlined to conserve time and resources and allow the school to attract the best options for business partners.
You Paid For It: Univ. purchase rules cost millions
A law to prevent corruption has had some unexpected consequences, and it could be costing taxpayers millions. State Senator Chapin Rose (R-Champaign) said it’s gotten so bad, universities take advantage of opportunities to buy out of state.

The university’s deputy comptroller Mike Bass said the university could run a cheaper, more efficient purchasing system on its own. He said it would still comply with all of the states transparency and ethics requirements. [But not competition, compliance and accountability ones?] "We should operate in the most nimble fashion that we can to get the job done for our constituents,” Bass said.

He said colleges often take higher bidders because of lower ones forget or have trouble filling out the dozens of forms required or because the system delays the actual purchase and prices go up. [Have you ever tried to apply to get in a college, or register, or change a class? Or teach, get tenure, get permission to obtain a grant in one? Educational institutions are amongst the most bureaucratic, yet authoritarian, institutions in the country, yet they can't run a simple procurement regime like the rest of government?]

Bass said colleges often take higher bidders because of lower ones forget or have trouble filling out the dozens of forms required or because the system delays the actual purchase and prices go up. "The whole procurement process can extend and when you do that, not only could the price point change but you could lose other competition,” Bass said.

Chief Procurement Officer for Higher Education Ben Bagby said there has been nothing to back up university claims of million dollar losses. He said the state is attempting to give exemptions for time sensitive grants. He said he isn’t convinced the university proposal will actually save money.

“We should be doing things right,” Bagby said. “The universities have not shown that moving to a separate procurement office will save money.”

"Those folks should be allowed to control their own destinies. Who cares that somebody in Springfield has to sign off a piece of paper to buy a pencil. Buy the pencil,” Sen. Rose said.
I feel pretty sure it's not about the pencil.

No comments: