Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Procurement Controversy du Jour: Malta

Investigation finds ‘flagrant breach’ of rules in €469,000 PBS car lease deal
The Public Broadcasting Services board and CEO John Bundy, a political appointee, locked horns over Bundy’s profligate spending, with the car leasing contract – which totals at least €469,000 when including VAT – becoming the subject of an internal inquiry by auditors RSM.

In late September, the PBS’s board of directors unanimously passed a motion of no confidence, after directors accused Bundy of showing a “lack of awareness of what the relationship should be between CEO and the board of directors.” They accused Bundy of taking arbitrary decisions, which were presented to the board as a fait accompli, and the directors were faced with threats of legal action against them personally and the company.” The investigation’s decision will vindicate a decision by the PBS board of directors to sack John Bundy, a veteran television presenter appointed to the PBS job in 2016 without a public call for appointment.

Bundy had only raised the issue once at board level on 18 January, when he sought advice on replacing PBS’s ageing car fleet. But the contract itself was never green-lit by the board.

Suspiciously, the person actually responsible for procurement at PBS, corporate services manager Edmund Tabone, was completely side-lined and left in the dark about the deal. Instead, it was left up to Mario Micallef, the manager for advertising sales, to gather the quotations.

Although MaltaToday reported a total of 14 different contracts signed for a car lease, the contracts investigation dealt with 13 cars, all leased for a total of eight years, varying from the cheapest for €230 monthly (plus VAT), to the highest being €600 (plus VAT), which was meant to be Bundy’s car.

One of the more curious aspects of the deal was that – according to board minutes seen by MaltaToday – one of the cars was for the exclusive use of Natalino Fenech, the former PBS head of news, who in 2013 stepped down from his position after Labour’s election. According to the directors’ minutes, Fenech was “still on PBS’ payroll with all perks and allowances”, despite his secondment to the University of Malta as a lecturer.

An investigation by the Department of Contracts has found a “flagrant breach” of procurement rules when the Public Broadcasting Services – on former CEO John Bundy’s watch – took out a €398,000 car leasing contract for eight years. “There are sufficient grounds to determine that procurement regulations have been blatantly breached and that such breaches irremediably vitiated the award of this procurement process. Consequently, it is being decided that, given the breaches are of a serious nature, the contracts awarded in terms of these class for quotations are terminated with immediate effect.”

The new investigation confirms previous reports by MaltaToday that PBS ignored clear rules to issue a public call for tenders, and instead obtained quotations from leasing suppliers. But it has now emerged that meetings were held with the prospective supplier, Burmarrad Commercials, before the company submitted its ‘winning’ quotation. “It is clear that the conduct by [PBS] seems, a prima facie, to have been focused to advantage the award of the quotations to Burmarrad Commercials. This is in flagrant breach of the procurement regulations.”

It was only after a meeting with Burmarrad Commercials’ representatives at PBS, that the company’s final quotation was actually submitted. In an email, the representative later told PBS employees: “…It was a great pleasure meeting you this morning. As discussed please find attached the revised quotations for the leasing of a fleet of vehicles for PBS.” Contracts Department director-general Anthony Cachia said the email and the fact the company had submitted its winning quotation after the meeting, meant Burmarrad Commercials was “an accomplice” in PBS’s breach of rules.

“This by its very essence breaches the principle of equal treatment and transparency. Apart from the fact that it is very unorthodox that quotations are subject to discussions, especially if such discussions took place with one of the potential suppliers, such conduct is clearly in breach of the fundamental principle which should underlie each procurement process.”

There was an additional breach: the €398,000 contract was artificially split into 13 individual contracts, each representing the cars being leased – one of which was for John Bundy.

No comments: