Labels and Tags

Accountability (66) Adequate documentation (4) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (14) Bidder prejudice (9) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (28) Competitive position (2) Compliance (32) Conflict of interest (28) Contract administration (24) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (1) Contractor responsibility (18) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (32) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (34) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (35) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (20) Fair and equitable treatment (13) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (13) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (4) Lore vs Law (4) market research (6) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (28) Mistakes (3) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (10) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (31) Past performance (10) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (46) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (88) Principles of procurement (21) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (75) Procurement ethics (17) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (15) Procurement procedures (29) Procurement reform (57) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (1) Protest - timing (10) Protests - general (35) Purposes and policies of procurement (9) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (3) Responsiveness (11) Restrictive specifications (3) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (46) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (1) Standards of review (2) Standing (5) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (8) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (59) Uniformity (5) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Procurement controversies -- Tanzania

Tender suspension irks appeals body
Government’s drugs procurement agency, Medical Stores Department (MSD) was on the spotlight once again after the Public Procurement Appeals Authority (PPAA) nullified its decision to suspend and order restart of a Sh573.8 million tender for supply of disposable syringes.

The tender was initially won by Salama Pharmaceuticals Limited but in less than a week to receiving a letter from MSD; the procurement proceedings was suspended on allegations of irregularities in evaluation process.

The agency claimed to have discovered a number of irregularities in the evaluation process including leakage of privileged information to one of the bidders.

PPAA said in its recent decision that the annulment of the tender was not justified as MSD did not have the mandate to annul the tender as the act amounted to interfering with the coming into force of the procurement contract.

Annulling the tender, PPAA said under section 55(7) of the Public Procurement Act, the respondent did not have the mandate to entertain the complaint after having awarded the tender.

“The authority concurs with the appellant that by the time the complaint was received from Ms Hindustan Syringes the contract was already in force in terms of section 55 (7)of the Public Procurement Act,” the authority said.

COMMENT: Under Guam law, a protest may be brought against an award of contract, and a contract resulting from an improper solicitation may be set aside, but there is no requirement to do so, even in the face of fraud on the part of the party improperly awarded the contract.

No comments: