As the government prepares revisions to regulations on official car procurement, domestic automakers are preparing to grab more market share from foreign joint venture manufacturers.
The new regulation, slated to be launched in June, will mandate that government offices across the country purchase more than 50 percent domestically branded cars for their fleets in the future.
The regulation will also change the guidelines for vehicles to be purchased, basically excluding most brands made by joint ventures.
German luxury car brand Audi's huge success in China should be in part attributed to its almost exclusive control of the nation's high-end official car market since it locally produced its flagship model, the A6, in 1999.
Li Shufu, chairman of Zhejiang Geely, commenting after his company acquired Swedish luxury brand Volvo that he will use Audi's business model in China to foster Volvo's future development here - indicating a new focus on the world's biggest government procurement cake.
"It's something that reflects the consumer philosophy when purchasing vehicles in China. For rich Chinese, they prefer the officials' car models which indicate car owners' prestige and provide them with more psychological satisfaction, and demonstrate the difference between them and ordinary people on the street," said Xiang Hansong, an auto industry watcher.
"As long as the government lowers the purchasing criteria of vehicles, foreign producers will lose interest in bidding," said Xue Xu, professor at the school of economics of Peking University.
"The new regulation will provide domestic brands a golden opportunity to expand and compete with foreign rivals in the world's biggest auto market," said Dong Yang, secretary-general of the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers.
Labels and Tags
Accountability (66) Adequate documentation (4) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (14) Bidder prejudice (9) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (28) Competitive position (2) Compliance (32) Conflict of interest (28) Contract administration (24) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (1) Contractor responsibility (18) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (32) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (34) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (35) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (20) Fair and equitable treatment (13) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (13) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (4) Lore vs Law (4) market research (6) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (28) Mistakes (3) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (10) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (31) Past performance (10) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (46) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (88) Principles of procurement (21) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (75) Procurement ethics (17) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (15) Procurement procedures (29) Procurement reform (57) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (1) Protest - timing (10) Protests - general (35) Purposes and policies of procurement (9) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (3) Responsiveness (11) Restrictive specifications (3) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (46) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (1) Standards of review (2) Standing (5) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (8) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (59) Uniformity (5) Unsolicited proposals (2)
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Taking local preference rules on the road in China
New procurement rules a win for domestic automakers From:China Daily