Patel’s idea is to use government procurement to promote demand for locally produced goods and services, as well as to improve the quality of such goods and services.
Such an office could add yet further impetus to an increasingly serious attempt to build local industry (and to create decent jobs) around public procurement.
Now, in the context of a country where the yearly Budget stands at over R900-billion, and where there are a host of State-owned enterprises spending serious money on investment projects (over and above their yearly stay-in-business expenditure), this focus on procurement makes sense. That is also why it is, arguably, being perceived as the lowest-hanging fruit within the second industrial policy action plan, or Ipap2.
However, it also has to be acknowledged that ‘buy local’ campaigns have a tendency to be associated with some serious negative con- sequences, such as increasing levels of corruption; creating the conditions for fronting; and increased pricing as localisation crowds out economic principles.
In a context of the nationalist chauvinism hinted at recently by the likes of the Black Management Forum, which had the impudence to suggest a review of the Constitution owing to the fact that some “noble” provisions had “unintended consequences”, the potential for such negative outcomes is real and has to be recognised from the outset.
Recent international experiences of local-content drives, particularly out of Brazil, are also somewhat encouraging.
Nevertheless, we have to be alive to both the threats and opportunities of any big local content push and attempt to build in safeguards to ensure that these are contained.
Labels and Tags
Accountability (66) Adequate documentation (4) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (14) Bidder prejudice (9) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (28) Competitive position (2) Compliance (32) Conflict of interest (28) Contract administration (24) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (1) Contractor responsibility (18) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (32) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (34) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (35) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (20) Fair and equitable treatment (13) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (13) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (4) Lore vs Law (4) market research (6) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (28) Mistakes (3) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (10) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (31) Past performance (10) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (46) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (88) Principles of procurement (21) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (75) Procurement ethics (17) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (15) Procurement procedures (29) Procurement reform (57) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (1) Protest - timing (10) Protests - general (35) Purposes and policies of procurement (9) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (3) Responsiveness (11) Restrictive specifications (3) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (46) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (1) Standards of review (2) Standing (5) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (8) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (59) Uniformity (5) Unsolicited proposals (2)
Friday, May 7, 2010
The paradox of preference
Safeguards needed as ‘buy local’ gains traction (South Africa)
Labels: Social preference provisions