Labels and Tags

Accountability (66) Adequate documentation (5) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (14) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (28) Competitive position (2) Compliance (32) Conflict of interest (28) Contract administration (24) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (1) Contractor responsibility (18) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (32) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (34) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (35) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (13) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (6) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (28) Mistakes (3) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (31) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (46) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (88) Principles of procurement (21) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (75) Procurement ethics (17) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (15) Procurement procedures (29) Procurement reform (57) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (1) Protest - timing (10) Protests - general (35) Purposes and policies of procurement (9) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (3) Responsiveness (11) Restrictive specifications (4) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (46) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (1) Standards of review (2) Standing (5) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (9) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (59) Uniformity (5) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Procurement controversies -- Australia

Fraud audit finds flaws in department
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry staff have been misusing corporate credit cards, travelling without approval and improperly awarding multimillion-dollar contracts, including one last year that was deliberately split to avoid going to open tender.

The details have emerged from internal audit files that also show in the past three years there have been more than 392 breaches by the department of the Financial Management Act or its regulations.

Jodi Gatfield, a department spokeswoman, said three senior executives were investigated in 2009-10, not eight.

This is directly contradicted by a fraud report filled out by Edward Stanmore, the department's head of audit. This document, released under freedom of information, stated eight ''senior executives/managers'', each with more than nine years' tenure, had been the target of internal fraud investigations.

Consecutive internal audits of procurement identified systemic issues and warned of a need for ''substantial change in behaviour from those executing and approving procurement processes''. A 2009 audit file said there were ''high levels of non compliance'' in procurement, and the department might not be able to show ''that tenderers were treated fairly and consistently''. This was followed by a memo in June last year that cited ''widespread evidence'' of continued problems including ''inadequate procurement processes''.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/fraud-audit-finds-flaws-in-department 20110918-1kg2g.html#ixzz1YMwUsV6V

Fraud probe targets top bureaucrats
In November 2008 a legal services contract was extended for 12 months and included a decision to increase its annual value by 42 per cent to $2,817,072.00.

The department requires legal advice for variations worth more than $500,000 but ''this policy was not complied with'', and there were no documents to show the variation represented value for money.

Last year a troubling purchase related to a conference event was found, which was ''split into two parts even though the intention was to select a single provider''. This avoided an open tender.

No comments: