Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Manage spending by following procurement rules

The Deputy Auditor General of South Africa said, "the failure to stick to proper procurement rules almost invariably led to a failure to manage spending." We've seen plenty of instances of exactly that lesson on Guam, too.

AG faults biggest state spenders for poor reporting
[Deputy Auditor General Kimi Madwetu said] "They are doing their accounting properly but failing the test in terms of complying with the system of sourcing goods and services."

This resulted in irregular expenditure of R2.286-billion by national departments, most of which was not identified by the departments themselves but by the AG's office.

Provincial departments, public entities and legislatures racked up another R18.4-billion in irregular expenditure for the past financial year.

"In terms of non-compliance, 92% of national departments are in the red, meaning that they have not complied with whatever applicable laws and regulations they needed to comply with," Makwetu said.

Most "would easily migrate [from in the red] to the green" if they made an effort to account properly on predetermined objectives and to comply with laws and regulations, notably supply chain management rules.

He said the failure to stick to proper procurement rules almost invariably led to a failure to manage spending.

"If procurement and contract management is not complied with the chances are that expenditure is also not going to be complied with. It is very interesting to see the correlation between the two."

A breakdown of the reasons for the adverse findings on supply chain management showed that unfair procurement and award contracts to government officials and their close family members were by far the biggest problems.

The deputy auditor-general on Wednesday lamented the lack of improved accounting in education, health and public works, as most state spending flowed through these departments.

"Since 70% of resources are going in this direction maybe the effort also needs to be directed at these areas."

"There are no clean audits in that area where the bulk of expenditures are being incurred," deputy auditor-general Kimi Makwetu told parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts ("Scopa"). Scopa chairman Themba Godi said the auditor-general's findings were disappointing because they reflected the same problems in state departments year after year.

No comments: