Labels and Tags

Accountability (69) Adequate documentation (6) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (2) Compliance (33) Conflict of interest (31) Contract administration (25) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (19) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (34) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (32) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (33) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (48) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (93) Principles of procurement (24) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (78) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (16) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (10) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (13) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (47) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (2) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (60) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Competition taken to task (order)

First a bit of nomenclature: MATOCs are "Multiple Award Task Order-based Contracts", and is a method of source selection used in the US federal contracting procedures.

Deltek: As feds turn to task order-based contracts, companies without spots will run behind, By Kevin Plexico
MATOCs allow agencies to set up a master contract through which individual task orders can be made. Agencies typically limit the number of contract holders, which limits competition for each task order to a pre-qualified set of vendors. Task orders can be issued and awarded within a matter of weeks — a far cry from the traditional months-long government solicitation process for the same type of work.

Winning a position on a MATOC doesn’t guarantee success; it means a company has won the right to bid again for each task order. There are many examples of companies that have won a seat, but actually received less than $100,000 as their competitors pulled in millions.

To succeed on a MATOC, companies must cast aside the established business development paradigm. In a traditional acquisition for a modestly complex procurement, companies have months to determine whether to bid, put together a team and develop a lengthy proposal. Of more than 11,000 task orders issued across 18 MATOCs that Deltek recently examined, over half required a proposal submission in 14 or fewer days.

MATOCs are tough on contractors, as winning a place generally requires a large investment and plenty of patience. Companies lacking the broad capabilities needed for a MATOC program may find themselves effectively locked out of competing for an agency’s work.

No comments: