Labels and Tags

Accountability (69) Adequate documentation (6) ADR in procurement (3) Allocation of risks (5) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (13) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (2) Compliance (33) Conflict of interest (31) Contract administration (25) Contract disputes (1) Contract extension or modification (8) Contract terms (2) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (19) Conviction (3) Cooperative purchasing (3) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (34) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (9) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (3) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (8) Governmental functions (26) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (12) Integrity of system (29) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (32) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (33) Past performance (12) Planning policy (33) Politics of procurement (48) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (93) Principles of procurement (24) Private vs public contract (15) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (78) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (27) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (16) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (10) Recusal (1) Remedies (16) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (13) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (12) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (59) Sole source (47) Sovereign immunity (2) Staffing (7) Standard commercial products (2) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (22) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (32) Transparency (60) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (2)

Friday, October 25, 2013

Debarring contractors takes root in UK

No procurement regime will ever be fully effective if it does not ride herd on wayward contractors.

In the US, there is a quaint notion that contractors will be suspended or debarred from government contracting work if they get caught engaging in contract fraud or rendering unsatisfactory performance.

 It is quaint because that penalty is most often applied to small contractors, and way too often ignored when it comes to the "too big to flail" naughty big boys of government contractors.

If they will not be suspended or debarred, there must be some other penalty applied to deter wayward performance to prevent government contracting from being a mockery of procurement principles.

Boss of Serco resigns in desperate bid to help group secure lucrative government work in the future
The security firm has been rocked by fraud allegations over a number of its contracts with the Ministry of Justice. A probe into its entire portfolio of government work is due to finish next month. Ministers said they would not give any fresh contracts to Serco until the review was completed.
Serco chief's exit shows companies need to think before they boast
Nobody should doubt Hyman's intention to run a decent company. The question is whether, when you've got 120,000 employees, any services business can hope to avoid regular catastrophes.
At Serco, of course, there have been more than a few recently. Allegations of overcharging on a tagging contract and dodgy record-keeping when escorting prisoners are the biggest issues. But there was also a damning official report on the state of Serco-operated Thameside prison. And "substandard" was the public accounts committee verdict on the company's operation of out-of-hours GP services in Cornwall.

No comments: