Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Fair competition saves Guam Dept. of Education $4 million

Guam's Department of Education has finally put out a competitive bid for its copier needs. For the last decade and more GDOE acquired its copier needs non-competitively, in a process the Guam Public Auditor had found to be illegal. The illegal contract expired at the end of 2009.

Since the beginning of this year Xerox has continued to service GDOE in a series of monthly roll-overs of the illegal and expired contract, under dubious if any legal authority.

In May, GDOE issued an IFB for a portion of the copier needs, the bids were opened and the low bidder noted, but GDOE has failed to issue any award under that bid. Island Business Systems & Supplies provided the low bid, against Xerox Corporation's bid.

Subsequently GDOE issued a new bid for all of its copier needs, which was opened this week.

IBSS is protesting the failure to award a contract under the May IFB, which may affect a portion of the machines solicited in this recent bid. IBSS does not believe Xerox should be given a second shot at the same machines after IBSS disclosed its pricing in the May bid.

The incumbent provider of the copier services all this time has been Xerox Corporation. It has been providing copiers at a base price cost of $133,000 per month.

Under the new competitively bid IFB, Xerox cut its price almost in half, to about $68,000 per month, base price.
The award has not yet been made, pending formal review of documentation.

At a savings of roughly $65,000 per month under its old monthly price, over the course of the upcoming 5 year contract, GDOE will save about $4,000,000.

Competitive procedures and competitive specifications are certainly worth the effort.

No comments: