Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

One pill makes you larger, and one pill makes you small

Federal Contractor Suspended
SBA suspended GTSI, a Herndon, Virginia-based company, from receiving future contracts. GTSI posted $762 million in revenue last year, nearly all of that from government contracts.

In a letter sent Friday to GTSI, the SBA said it was suspending the company from federal contracting because GTSI did almost all of the work on contracts that were awarded to other businesses—firms that, unlike GTSI, actually qualified for these small business contracts.

“There is evidence that GTSI’s prime contractors had little to no involvement in the performance of its contracts, in direct contravention of applicable laws and regulations regarding the award of small business contracts,” SBA’s letter read. “The evidence shows that GTSI was an active participant in a scheme that resulted in contracts set aside for small businesses being awarded to ineligible contractors.”

The aftershocks of the suspension were felt today, when Eyak Technology, an Alaskan Native Corporation, withdrew its offer to buy GTSI for $7.50 per share. By noon, GTSI’s stock had fallen by 40 percent, to only $4.34.

GTSI’s relationship with two ANCs were highlighted in a series of stories published last week by the Washington Post. As a result of treaties with Alaskan tribes, there are no size limits on contracts set aside for ANCs. Although ANCs contend they distribute two-thirds of their profits to their shareholders, the Post reported that individual members of Alaskan tribes received little money from ANCs. Much of ANC’s contracting dollars go to their non-native Alaskan managers, and their subcontractors, the Post concluded.

ANCs, however, are just one problem area when it comes to small business contracting. The federal government routinely misses its goal of awarding 23 percent of its contracting dollars to small businesses. But agencies that miss their goals don’t suffer any consequences, other than a poor grade on an SBA scorecard.

Plus, large businesses keep showing up on lists of contracts that supposedly were awarded to small businesses, meaning small businesses actually are getting much less money than the government’s numbers indicate.

Government contracting is a swamp that needs to be drained. Too many companies are gaming the system, getting money that should be going to legitimate small businesses.

No comments: