Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Get procurement out of the way of government business

Jamaica: When the law is a shackle
"I am personally convinced that the rules and the fear of just being off the line .... have driven inaction for the simplest thing," adviser to the prime minister and head of the liquefied natural gas (LNG) steering committee Dr Carlton Davis told a Gleaner Editors' Forum last week.

"We have to recognise that this is a business world, this is not a world in which people have time to sit down and solve a thing." Davis asserted.

Like Davis, former chairman of the LNG steering committee and president of the Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica Christopher Zacca is convinced Jamaica will not be able to make significant advancement unless the procurement rules are revamped. He argued that the energy sector requires special treatment and should be subject to different rules as it relates to procurement.

"This energy thing is of such moment that it cannot be a slave so completely to methodology and rules that you get straight As for methodology and rules and straight Bs for effectiveness and economics," said Davis.

Davis and Zacca's call for changes to the procurement guidelines has the full support of Minister of Transport, Works and Housing Dr Omar Davies.

"The whole procurement process, it is lengthy, and does not necessarily guarantee the equity and the transparency," Davies told The Sunday Gleaner.

The procurement guidelines are at the heart of a dispute involving Minister of Transport, Works and Housing Dr Omar Davies and the OCG.

In April, Davies announced in Parliament that the Cabinet had established the IOP to advise it on the implementation of three megaprojects, two of which had not received the blessing of Christie.

At that time, Davies said the administration, "will not allow the OCG to be a stumbling block in the engagement of private entities as the State moves to take advantage of investment opportunities".

Christie immediately responded, arguing that the establishment of the IOP was an attempt to usurp the OCG.

"The OCG takes strong offence and exception to any suggestion that is made that by virtue of the discharge of its lawful mandates, under the Contractor General Act, as is prescribed by the Parliament of Jamaica, and which it is sworn to do, that it is impeding economic growth and development in Jamaica," said Christie.

The projects are the north-south Highway 2000 link, Gordon Cay container transhipment hub, and the Fort Augusta container terminal.

According to Davies, were it not for the intervention of the OCG last year, the Chinese investors would have long advanced work on the north-south link of Highway 2000.

"I have just reviewed the files which reported on former Minister Audley Shaw's visit to Beijing, and a year ago, they were at a stage where had we proceeded, the Mount Rosser bypass would now be complete," Davies said last month.

That did not phase Christie, who has consistently argued that the OCG was set up to ensure that government contracts and licences are void of irregularity, impropriety and corruption.

"The OCG is of the view that economic development must be pursued in a sustainable and responsible manner, and within an appropriate system of institutionalised and independent checks and balances which will ensure that the Jamaican taxpayer can be guaranteed value for money and that all government commercial transactions will withstand the highest levels of scrutiny and probity."

The parties are now before the courts for a determination on whether the OCG can dictate members of the IOP to report to it.

No comments: