Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Procurement education necessary

Editorial from the Marianas Business Journal, Vol. 10 No.6. Note the link to the article requires subscription to access online.

Procurement education necessary
Kudos to those responsible for the Summer 2012 Guam Procurement Conference at the Hyatt Regency Guam held July 23 and 24. We are encouraged by reports that the conference was well attended and that participants demonstrated both their own knowledge and an eagerness to learn and improve their performance.

As well, it appears that Guam Community College is planning to boost its procurement education program from its current two-week course to, potentially, a procurement institute.

Danielle Conway, professor at the University of Hawaii's School of Law, the main conference presenter, is quite right when she says that government procurement regulations are for the protection of the taxpayers' dollar and the protection of those involved in the process. Unfortunately, though for whatever reason, the failure to comply with those regulations, or allegations of failure to comply get in the way of getting the government's business done.

The myriad of procurement problems that affect services at our schools, our hospital, our port and elsewhere reinforce our perceptions about the inefficiencies inherent in government. Government services are too often held up because seeming obvious solutions cannot be implemented while contracting irregularities are rectified.

Of course, we understand the consequences of inadequate regulation. Money that is not properly overseen is money that will be wasted - stolen outright at worst, inefficiently spent at best. The money that came from everybody is too easily treated as though it belongs to nobody.

So we're happy to see an effort to develop competent procurement professionals, capable of administering the government's procurement regulations fairly, efficiently - and correctly. We are also of the belief that simplified regulations would assist the process.

We don't doubt that she is correct, but we're not encouraged by Conway's reassurance that Guam's procurement problems are no different than anyone else's. One conclusion to be drawn is that the process cannot be improved - surely the problems would not be ubiquitous otherwise.

A more hopeful conclusion, advanced by Conway and by local procurement-education advocate John Thos. Brown, is that no one has yet launched a procurement institute such as is envisioned - potentially making Guam an example for the rest of the procurement world.

No comments: