Labels and Tags

Accountability (71) Adequate documentation (7) ADR in procurement (4) Allocation of risks (6) Best interest of government (11) Best practices (19) Best value (15) Bidder prejudice (11) Blanket purchase agreement (1) Bridge contract (2) Bundling (6) Cancellation and rejection (2) Centralized procurement structure (12) Changes during bid process (14) Clarifications vs Discussions (1) Competence (9) Competition vs Efficiency (29) Competitive position (3) Compliance (35) Conflict of interest (32) Contract administration (26) Contract disputes (4) Contract extension or modification (9) Contract formation (1) Contract interpretation (1) Contract terms (3) Contract types (6) Contract vs solicitation dispute (2) Contractor responsibility (20) Conviction (4) Cooperative purchasing (3) Corrective action (1) Cost and pricing (13) Debarment (4) Determinations (8) Determining responsibility (37) Disclosure requirements (7) Discussions during solicitation (10) Disposal of surplus property (3) Effective enforcement requirement (35) Effective procurement management (5) Effective specifications (36) Emergency procurement (14) eProcurement (5) Equitable tolling (2) Evaluation of submissions (22) Fair and equitable treatment (14) Fair and reasonable value (23) Fiscal effect of procurement (14) Frivolous protest (1) Good governance (12) Governmental functions (27) Guam (14) Guam procurement law (12) Improper influence (11) Incumbency (13) Integrity of system (31) Interested party (7) Jurisdiction (1) Justification (1) Life-cycle cost (1) Limits of government contracting (5) Lore vs Law (4) market research (7) Materiality (3) Methods of source selection (33) Mistakes (4) Models of Procurement (1) Needs assessment (11) No harm no foul? (8) Offer & acceptance (1) Other procurement links (14) Outsourcing (34) Past performance (12) Planning policy (34) Politics of procurement (52) PPPs (6) Prequalification (1) Principle of competition (95) Principles of procurement (25) Private vs public contract (17) Procurement authority (5) Procurement controversies series (79) Procurement ethics (19) Procurement fraud (31) Procurement lifecycle (9) Procurement philosophy (17) Procurement procedures (30) Procurement reform (63) Procurement theory (11) Procurement workforce (2) Procurment philosophy (6) Professionalism (17) Protest - formality (2) Protest - timing (12) Protests - general (37) Purposes and policies of procurement (11) Recusal (1) Remedies (17) Requirement for new procurement (4) Resolution of protests (4) Responsiveness (14) Restrictive specifications (5) Review procedures (13) RFQ vs RFP (1) Scope of contract (16) Settlement (2) Social preference provisions (60) Sole source (48) Sovereign immunity (3) Staffing (8) Standard commercial products (3) Standards of review (2) Standing (6) Stays and injunctions (6) Structure of procurement (1) Substantiation (9) Surety (1) Suspension (6) The procurement record (1) The role of price (10) The subject matter of procurement (23) Trade agreements vs procurement (1) Training (33) Transparency (63) Uniformity (6) Unsolicited proposals (3)

Monday, August 20, 2012

Procurement ethics for private contractors?

Government should adopt standards for private contractors
The federal government issues more than $260 billion in government contracts each year, with few restrictions on the employees of those contractors.

Government ethics expert Kathleen Clark, JD, professor of law at Washington University in St. Louis, has written extensively about this issue in the last year with three papers: “Ethics, Employees and Contractors: Financial Conflicts In and Out of Government”; “Fiduciary Standards for Bailout Contractors: What Treasury Got Right and Wrong in TARP”; and “Ethics for an Outsourced Government”.

The federal government hasn’t yet outsourced the job of Cabinet secretary, but almost all tasks that government employees perform are also performed by contractor personnel. Contractors perform jobs that are mundane or menial, such as hauling trash, but also tasks that are sophisticated and require discretion, such as providing advice about how to respond to climate change.

Over the course of 25 years, the federal government increased its spending on service contracting by 85 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars. While the government has increased its spending on service contracting, it has actually decreased the number of government employees who supervise that contract spending.

So much so that now the government actually outsources to contractors the function of supervising and evaluating the work of other contractors. That is of the areas where the government is at highest risk for ethical misconduct by contractors: where contractors can influence how the government spends money but are not subject to rigorous government ethics standards. Last year, the government adopted a new regulation to impose some ethics standards on some of these individuals, but it is not yet clear how the government and contractors are implementing that regulation.

Back in 2008, the Department of the Treasury used a contractor as the point person for its bailout of AIG. That contractor was a former employee of Goldman Sachs and owned a substantial amount of Goldman stock. He advised the government to handle the AIG bailout in a way that benefited Goldman Sachs — and himself, as a Goldman shareholder. If he had been a government employee, he could have gone to prison for this conflict of interest. But as a contractor, the conflict of interest law didn’t apply to him.

The ABA Model Procurement Code, substantially adopted on Guam, contains a code of ethics for private as well as public procurement participants. Unfortunately, the enforcement mechanism for each of them is rather ineffective, as implemented on Guam.

No comments: